<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s Security Debacle, and the Publishing of Stolen Documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/</link>
	<description>Creating a User&#039;s Guide to Democratized Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:24:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=348#comment-166</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re comparing this with the Pentagon Papers? GMAB...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re comparing this with the Pentagon Papers? GMAB&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=348#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Thank God the New York Times wasn&#039;t pukeworthy with the Pentagon Papers. Your cynicism is selective, bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God the New York Times wasn&#8217;t pukeworthy with the Pentagon Papers. Your cynicism is selective, bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=348#comment-162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cody, I don&#039;t think TechCrunch deserves that level of contempt. While I believe they&#039;ve made a mistake in this case, I also have a lot of respect for what they&#039;ve accomplished in other ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cody, I don&#8217;t think TechCrunch deserves that level of contempt. While I believe they&#8217;ve made a mistake in this case, I also have a lot of respect for what they&#8217;ve accomplished in other ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=348#comment-161</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch has now joined the ranks of TMZ.com and Valleywag in my books. I can only hope someone returns to favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch has now joined the ranks of TMZ.com and Valleywag in my books. I can only hope someone returns to favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Norris</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/07/16/twitters-security-debacle-and-the-publishing-of-stolen-documents/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=348#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful article and I appreciate your point of view.  Reminds me of a test that our Washington DC lobbyist uses to check on what they say or write - how would you feel if this showed up on the front page of the Washington Post?  Follow me on Twitter on craigdnorris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful article and I appreciate your point of view.  Reminds me of a test that our Washington DC lobbyist uses to check on what they say or write &#8211; how would you feel if this showed up on the front page of the Washington Post?  Follow me on Twitter on craigdnorris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
