<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Tiger All the Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediactive.com/2009/11/30/all-tiger-all-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/11/30/all-tiger-all-the-time/</link>
	<description>Creating a User&#039;s Guide to Democratized Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:27:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/11/30/all-tiger-all-the-time/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1040#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>I would rather be a greeter at Walmart than send journalists off to cover a celebrity&#039;s private life in this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather be a greeter at Walmart than send journalists off to cover a celebrity&#8217;s private life in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meadows</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2009/11/30/all-tiger-all-the-time/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>John Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1040#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>But the same public turns around and demands this kind of tripe. Bad journalism sells (look at popular FOX news is).

If a network, newspaper, etc. decided to de-emphasize celebrity and lifestyle news in favour of more hard news, covered in an in-depth manner, what would its chances be of surviving?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the same public turns around and demands this kind of tripe. Bad journalism sells (look at popular FOX news is).</p>
<p>If a network, newspaper, etc. decided to de-emphasize celebrity and lifestyle news in favour of more hard news, covered in an in-depth manner, what would its chances be of surviving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
