<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft of Chapter 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediactive.com/2010/01/05/draft-of-chapter-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/01/05/draft-of-chapter-4/</link>
	<description>Creating a User&#039;s Guide to Democratized Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/01/05/draft-of-chapter-4/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1181#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>&quot;A major focus in this chapter will be on transparency, something I’m advocating more and more ardently in all kinds of communication.&quot;

See my cynical take on this in my column:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/feb/15/media.comment

&quot;The appearance of companies that pay bloggers to write about advertisers&#039; products has created an uproar, pitting those who have been called the &quot;sidewalk hookers of the blogosphere&quot; against A-listers  who might be termed the blog world&#039;s &quot;executive escorts&quot;&quot;

And I like the sardonic way Valleywag once put it:

http://valleywag.gawker.com/233971/disclosure-the-aspiring-shills-best-friend

&quot;Unfortunately, despite blog-media&#039;s near-sexual fixation on transparency, disclosure is not a means toward absolution for ridiculous acts. Disclosure is actually a test of your audience&#039;s tolerance for chicanery.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A major focus in this chapter will be on transparency, something I’m advocating more and more ardently in all kinds of communication.&#8221;</p>
<p>See my cynical take on this in my column:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/feb/15/media.comment" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/feb/15/media.comment</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The appearance of companies that pay bloggers to write about advertisers&#8217; products has created an uproar, pitting those who have been called the &#8220;sidewalk hookers of the blogosphere&#8221; against A-listers  who might be termed the blog world&#8217;s &#8220;executive escorts&#8221;"</p>
<p>And I like the sardonic way Valleywag once put it:</p>
<p><a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/233971/disclosure-the-aspiring-shills-best-friend" rel="nofollow">http://valleywag.gawker.com/233971/disclosure-the-aspiring-shills-best-friend</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, despite blog-media&#8217;s near-sexual fixation on transparency, disclosure is not a means toward absolution for ridiculous acts. Disclosure is actually a test of your audience&#8217;s tolerance for chicanery.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

