<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Old Guard Misses, Again, the Emerging Journalism Ecosystem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/</link>
	<description>Creating a User&#039;s Guide to Democratized Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Hinchliff Pearson</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Hinchliff Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Great post, Dan. I thought On the Media&#039;s piece on this story was equally outdated, and I was surprised. Maybe Bob Garfield was just playing devil&#039;s advocate, but his questions about whether journalists should feel slighted because this award went to a non-journalist seemed to completely miss the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Dan. I thought On the Media&#8217;s piece on this story was equally outdated, and I was surprised. Maybe Bob Garfield was just playing devil&#8217;s advocate, but his questions about whether journalists should feel slighted because this award went to a non-journalist seemed to completely miss the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ross</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan -  good blog! 
In our new book, Handbook for Citizen Journalists, we define four levels of journalism. The level of journalism Rappleye is referring to would be in the category of ACCIDENTAL journalist. Any citizen who treats an injured or ill person as an act of human decency is an ACCIDENTAL medic. In the same manner, any citizen who reports news from an unexpected event, is an ACCIDENTAL journalist. We know that citizens can be trained as journalists just as they can be trained as medics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan &#8211;  good blog!<br />
In our new book, Handbook for Citizen Journalists, we define four levels of journalism. The level of journalism Rappleye is referring to would be in the category of ACCIDENTAL journalist. Any citizen who treats an injured or ill person as an act of human decency is an ACCIDENTAL medic. In the same manner, any citizen who reports news from an unexpected event, is an ACCIDENTAL journalist. We know that citizens can be trained as journalists just as they can be trained as medics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Dan: Good post. What makes the faint praise for citizen journalism all the more frustrating is that the Neda video was nothing new. In 1996 a banker and amateur photographer named &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/10/us/1996-pulitzer-prizes-form-snapshot-portrait-journalists-theworkaday-world.html?pagewanted=5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Charles Porter won a Pulitzer&lt;/a&gt; for his picture of a firefighter holding a fatally injured baby outside the Oklahoma City bombing site. Because Porter sold his photo to a mainstream media outlet, I guess he was sanitized, and no one had to think about the implications of ordinary people engaged in acts of journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: Good post. What makes the faint praise for citizen journalism all the more frustrating is that the Neda video was nothing new. In 1996 a banker and amateur photographer named <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/10/us/1996-pulitzer-prizes-form-snapshot-portrait-journalists-theworkaday-world.html?pagewanted=5" rel="nofollow">Charles Porter won a Pulitzer</a> for his picture of a firefighter holding a fatally injured baby outside the Oklahoma City bombing site. Because Porter sold his photo to a mainstream media outlet, I guess he was sanitized, and no one had to think about the implications of ordinary people engaged in acts of journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennie Williams</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennie Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>Just so long as the citizen journalists stick to the facts and the truth let them go for it and be honored if they are honest, unbiased and good writers. But if they are talking heads, they need to be called such. Such bias is killing the credibility of journalism as an art and as a profession. It is helping the formation of superficial parties like the Tea Party and it is creating fodder for the far right to attack even if such attacks are frivolous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so long as the citizen journalists stick to the facts and the truth let them go for it and be honored if they are honest, unbiased and good writers. But if they are talking heads, they need to be called such. Such bias is killing the credibility of journalism as an art and as a profession. It is helping the formation of superficial parties like the Tea Party and it is creating fodder for the far right to attack even if such attacks are frivolous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Matthew, I couldn&#039;t agree more. I didn&#039;t mean to suggest that there&#039;s only one role for non-professionals in the new ecosystem. There are many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I didn&#8217;t mean to suggest that there&#8217;s only one role for non-professionals in the new ecosystem. There are many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Terenzio</title>
		<link>http://mediactive.com/2010/02/24/the-old-guard-misses-again-the-emerging-journalism-ecosystem/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Terenzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediactive.com/?p=1314#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan. Well said. 

I&#039;d also like to see more recognition for web applications that discover, aggregate and present useful information. These are acts of journalism themselves. For too long they have been looked at in the way that news organizations looked at the &quot;production&quot; department in the past.

A good SQL query, for example, is tantamount to a reporter asking the right question. Displaying it in a usable way, is the equivalent of writing well enough for the readers to understand the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan. Well said. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see more recognition for web applications that discover, aggregate and present useful information. These are acts of journalism themselves. For too long they have been looked at in the way that news organizations looked at the &#8220;production&#8221; department in the past.</p>
<p>A good SQL query, for example, is tantamount to a reporter asking the right question. Displaying it in a usable way, is the equivalent of writing well enough for the readers to understand the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

