NY Times Still Doesn’t Call Torture What It Is

New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan tackles her paper’s unwillingness to use plain, accurate language in an almost hard-hitting post, “‘Targeted Killing,’ ‘Detainee’ and ‘Torture’: Why Language Choice Matters”. She asks editors about these choices and gets, sorry to say, mushy answers. She concludes:

When news organizations accept the government’s way of speaking, they seem to accept the government’s way of thinking. In The Times, these decisions carry even more weight.

Word choices like these deserve thoughtful consideration – and, at times, some institutional soul-searching.

By my reckoning, the Times could do a bunch more soul-searching.

Posted in Mediactive Project
0 comments on “NY Times Still Doesn’t Call Torture What It Is
1 Pings/Trackbacks for "NY Times Still Doesn’t Call Torture What It Is"
  1. […] sentence or two from you about why it’s noteworthy; and perhaps a short quote. Here’s an example in the category of media literacy (from my Mediactive blog). By the end of the week, I want to […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

book coverThis book and website are published under a Creative Commons license that allows anyone to download and make copies (for non-commercial purposes).

Here's how you can read (or buy) the book.

Follow Mediactive

Subscribe